The Holy Grail of stock trading is a fully developed system of trading stocks which consistently produces high returns with tolerable draw-downs. While I have never claimed to be looking for the Holy Grail, I have written about virtually every aspect of trading system development, and, in fact, we teach the subject in our Technical Analysis Course.
As I recall, the first steps in developing a successful trading system lie in knowing when to go long and when to go short and finding the best Strategy to use for finding the right stocks. Money management rules are then applied to reduce risk and optimize performance.
Traditionally, we have used our Market Timing System to know when to go long or short and the UniSearch Tool along with QuickTest to find the most promising Strategies to use. The Back-Testing features of Portfolio Manager are then used to reduce risk and optimize performance. The Simulator performs all of these tasks automatically and is the ultimate tool for trading system development.
The VectorVest RealTime Derby, however, adds a new dimension to the process. It tracks and displays the daily performance of 185 10-stock portfolios, tick-by-tick, from the opening bell to the market's close. The data from each day's performance is stored in a Derby Tote Board which allows us to study the cumulative performance of each portfolio over any selected time period.
Observation of the top five performing portfolios for the five-day periods provides a market timing system unto itself. For example, the market is bullish when all five portfolios are derived from Bullish Strategies. It is bearish when all five portfolios are derived from Bearish Strategies. It is in transition when they are mixed. These observations do not conflict with the information given by the Color Guard, but complement it.
The Tote Board performance data also complements the work done by the QuickTest tool. While the Tote Board sums the daily performance of the 10-stock portfolios created each day, QuickTest displays the performance of a single l0-stock portfolio from the day it was created to the end of the time span. Therefore, the results are different. Which data set is a better indicator of future performance?
Hopefully, you watched last week's "Strategy of the Week" presentation. It showed that going long on July 12th with a Strategy selected from the Tote Board's list of 5-day top performing portfolios produced wonderful results. What would the sequence of five QuickTests from the close of July 2nd to the close of July 12th have told me? (This sequence of QuickTests was run on the Simulator and is called "Quick Sims.") Here are the results:
| Tote Board |
Quick Sims |
| Jail Break - No Contra ETFs - 16.56% |
S&P600 Small Cap/RT - 14.71% |
| S&P600 Small Cap/RT - 15.56% |
Silber's Singles/BMB - 10.13% |
| Blyar's Bottom Feeders/BMB - 15.22% |
Pirates Long - 10.08% |
| Russell 2000/RT - 14.83% |
Odd Fellows Long - 9.41% |
| Bottoms Up - 13.49% |
S&P100/RT - 9.31% |
| Silber's Singles/BMB - 11.82% |
Bottoms Up - 9.26% |
| Jubilee - 10.95% |
Blyar's Bottom Feeders/BMB - 8.65% |
| VST Mighty Mites - 10.89% |
Jail Break - No Contra ETFs - 8.55% |
| Odd Fellows Long - 10.46% |
Jubilee - 8.08% |
| Pirates Long - 9.63% |
S&P500/RT - 7.93% |
My first observation is that eight of the top 10 Tote Board Strategies also made the top 10 of the Quick Sims list. However, the S&P600 Small Cap/RT Strategy was the only one ranked in the top five performers of both lists. Since July 12th, it is the second biggest gainer in the Tote Board with 17.37% as of yesterday. Quick Test also showed a nice gain of 12.11%.
Jail Break - No Contra ETFs, the biggest 5-day winner ala the Tote Board, came in fourth place with a Tote Board gain of 15.69% since July 12th and a gain of 6.85% ala QuickTest. Finally, Silber's Singles/BMB, the second highest stock ala QuickTest, showed a gain of 6.18% since July 12th ala the Tote Board and -0.48% ala QuickTest.
So which is the better indicator of future performance? That's hard to say with so little data, but I'm leaning toward the Tote Board. However, I haven't taken efficiency into account in this comparison and it could be The Difference Maker.
EFFICIENT PERFORMERS - PART II.
Jerry D'Ambrosio dazzled us with his presentation last week, so we decided to explore it a little further. Let's see what Mr. Todd Shaffer can do with the technique Jerry described. Visit the VectorVest University to see this week's "Strategy of the Week" presentation: "Efficient Performers - Part II."